Cases 41 - 50 of 83
Thum v. Rozanski et al
as 1:2017cv01638
Plaintiff:
Celine Thum
Defendant:
Horacio D. Rozanski, Lloyd W. Howell, Jr., Kevin L. Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
In re: Nicholas Purpura v. Governor of New Jersey, et al
as 15-4067
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: NICHOLAS PURPURA, a sovereign citizen, and for people similarly situated in New Jersey that hold citizenship in United States
Defendant - Respondent:
GOVERNOR OF NEW JERSEY, STEVEN M. SWEENEY, VINCENT PRIETO, Assembly Speaker and others
Nominal Respondent:
MICHAEL A. SHIPP
USA v. Kevin Barne
as 15-3604
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
KEVIN BARNES
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv06465
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01783
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
USA v. Parrish Barne
as 15-1317
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
PARRISH BARNES
BARNES v. TRANS UNION, LLC et al
as 2:2014cv05099
Plaintiff:
JAMES ANTHONY BARNES
Defendant:
TRANS UNION, LLC and EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
O. G. v. Darryl George, et al
as 14-8109
Petitioner:
O. G., BRENDA BARNES-GEORGE, individually and as Parents and Natural Guardians of O.G. and DARRYL GEORGE
Respondent:
MILLBURN TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION, RICHARD BRODOW, personally and in his Official capacity, WILLIAM MIRON, personally and in his Official capacity and others
In re: Tormu Prall
as 14-3442
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: TORMU E. PRALL
Defendant - Respondent:
MICHELE R. RICCI, WILLIAM MOLEINS, CHRIS HOLMES and others
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
JEROME B. SIMANDLE
In Re: Tormu Prall
as 14-2074
Petitioner:
TORMU E. PRALL
Respondent:
JOSEPH L. BOCCHINI, JR., ARTHUR R. SYPEK, JR., CHARLES ELLIS and others
Nominal Respondent:
JEROME B. SIMANDLE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
