Cases 41 - 50 of 65
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv02051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv01298
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
NHS PHILADELPHIA et al v. RENDELL
as 2:2009cv04109
Plaintiff:
NHS PHILADELPHIA, NHS PENNSYLVANIA, NHS YOUTH SERVICES, INC. and others
Defendant:
EDWARD G. RENDELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NEW JERSEY ACADEMY OF OPHTHALMOLOGY v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN AFFAIRS
as 3:2009cv01223
Plaintiff:
NEW JERSEY ACADEMY OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN AFFAIRS
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
MIDDLETON v. ACADEMY COLLECTION SERVICE, INC.,
as 2:2009cv00930
Plaintiff:
STEVEN MIDDLETON
Defendant:
ACADEMY COLLECTION SERVICE, INC.,
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
HENNIS v. ACADEMY COLLECTION SERVICES, INC.
as 2:2009cv00576
Plaintiff:
LARRY HENNIS
Defendant:
ACADEMY COLLECTION SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MCCOY et al v. ACADEMY COLLECTION SERVICES, INC.
as 2:2008cv05286
Plaintiff:
JOHN MCCOY and MARCUS MCCOY
Defendant:
ACADEMY COLLECTION SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
CHAN v. ACADEMY COLLECTION SERVICES, INC.
as 2:2008cv04874
Plaintiff:
HENRY CHAN
Defendant:
ACADEMY COLLECTION SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
HESINGTON v. ACADEMY COLLECTION SERVICES, INC.
as 2:2008cv04716
Plaintiff:
REGINA GILLMORE HESINGTON
Defendant:
ACADEMY COLLECTION SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
ROMERO v. ACADEMY COLLECTION SERVICES, INC.
as 2:2008cv04472
Plaintiff:
ALLAN ROMERO
Defendant:
ACADEMY COLLECTION SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
