Cases 41 - 50 of 125
Fusco v. Kellow et al
as 1:2021cv00183
Plaintiff:
Pasqualino Di Fusco
Defendant:
Michael W. Sutherlin, David J. Miller, Mark Spurbeck and others
Nominal Defendant:
Peabody Energy Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MISENHEIMER v. AKERS BIOSCIENCES, INC. et al
as 1:2021cv02310
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER C. SCHREIBER, BILL J. WHITE, JOSHUA SILVERMAN and others
Plaintiff:
ALAN MISENHEIMER
PALKON v. ALASKA COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS GROUP, INC. et al
as 5:2021cv00481
Plaintiff:
DENNIS PALKON
Defendant:
Benjamin C. DUSTER, IV,, Bill Bishop, Shelly Lombard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Coulibaly v. Alaska Communications Systems Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00131
Plaintiff:
Salif Coulibaly
Defendant:
Benjamin C. Duster, IV, Bill Bishop, Shelly Lombard and others
William KaetzIn re: William Kaetz
as 21-1006
Petitioner:
In re: WILLIAM F. KAETZ, AKA Bill Kaetz
Respondent:
CYNTHIA REED EDDY and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Stein v. Concho Resources Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv01582
Defendant:
Joe Wright, Tucker Bridwell, Bill Easter and others
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
Chappidi v. Concho Resources Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv01584
Defendant:
Falcon Merger Sub Corp., Joe Wright, Tucker Bridwell and others
Plaintiff:
Rayja Laxmi Chappidi
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01258
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
IN THE MATTER OF: MISCELLANEOUS ASSETS SEIZED FROM BILL OMAR CARRASQUILLO et al
as 2:2020mc00071
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In Re:
IN THE MATTER OF: MISCELLANEOUS ASSETS SEIZED FROM BILL OMAR CARRASQUILLO
Chalmers Simpson, Jr. v. Pennsylvania Board of Probatio, et al
as 20-1331
Defendant / Appellee:
PAROLE AGENT AMY BURRELL, PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, PAROLE AGENT MATT SHEAFFER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHALMERS A. SIMPSON, JR.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
