Cases 41 - 50 of 305
Yellets v. Gu et al
as 1:2022cv00156
Nominal Defendant:
Hyzon Motors Inc. and Decarbonization Plus Acquisition Corporation
Plaintiff:
Lyle Yellets
Defendant:
George Gu, Craig Knight, Erik Anderson and others
Dolan v. HollyFrontier Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv01670
Plaintiff:
Timothy Dolan
Defendant:
HollyFrontier Corporation, Franklin Myers, Michael C. Jennings and others
Jacobs v. HollyFrontier Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv01668
Plaintiff:
Stanley Jacobs
Defendant:
HollyFrontier Corporation, Franklin Myers, Michael C. Jennings and others
HOPKINS v. DAWSON GEOPHYSICAL COMPANY et al
as 2:2021cv04976
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW HOPKINS
Defendant:
DAWSON GEOPHYSICAL COMPANY, STEPHEN C JUMPER, CRAIG W COOPER and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
CICCOTELLI v. JMP GROUP, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv04798
Plaintiff:
ALEX CICCOTELLI
Defendant:
JMP GROUP, LLC, JOSEPH A JOLSON, CRAIG R JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Wolf v. JMP Group LLC et al
as 1:2021cv01510
Plaintiff:
Jack Wolf
Defendant:
JMP Group LLC, Joseph A. Jolson, Craig R. Johnson and others
FINGER v. VICI PROPERTIES INC. et al
as 2:2021cv19213
Plaintiff:
SUSAN FINGER
Defendant:
VICI PROPERTIES INC., JAMES R ABRAHAMSON, DIANA F CANTOR and others
BUSHANSKY v. VICI PROPERTIES INC. et al
as 1:2021cv18429
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN BUSHANSKY
Defendant:
VICI PROPERTIES INC., JAMES R. ABRAHAMSON, DIANA F. CANTOR and others
BUSHANSKY v. VICI PROPERTIES INC. et al
as 2:2021cv18429
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN BUSHANSKY
Defendant:
VICI PROPERTIES INC., JAMES R. ABRAHAMSON, DIANA F. CANTOR and others
Kenneth Piner, et al v. Bureau of Narcotics, et al
as 21-2850
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH J. PINER
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STEPHEN PINER
Defendant / Appellee:
BUREAU OF NARCOTICS, Drug Strike Force Section, WEST DRUG TASK FORCE, Narcotic Investigations, REGIONAL DIRECTOR RANDY FEATHERS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
