Cases 41 - 48 of 48
KARNS CITY AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT v. JUUL LABS, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv01073
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-100, ALTRIA GROUP, INC., ALTRIA GROUP DISTRIBUTION COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
KARNS CITY AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
SOUTH BUTLER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT v. JUUL LABS, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv01056
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-100, INCLUSIVE, ALTRIA GROUP, INC., ALTRIA GROUP DISTRIBUTION COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
SOUTH BUTLER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
BUTLER AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT v. JUUL LABS, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv00926
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-100, INCLUSIVE, NU MARK LLC, ALTRIA GROUP DISTRIBUTION COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
BUTLER AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Juul Labs Inc v. 4x Pods, et al
as 20-1490
Defendant / Appellee:
ELECTRIC TOBACCONIST LLC
Defendant / Appellant:
4X PODS and GREGORY GRISHAYEV
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JUUL LABS INC
PENNRIDGE SCHOOL DISTRICT BUCKS COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA v. JUUL LABS, INC.
as 2:2020cv00402
Defendant:
JUUL LABS, INC.
Plaintiff:
PENNRIDGE SCHOOL DISTRICT BUCKS COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
NESHAMINY SCHOOL DISTRICT BUCKS COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA v. JUUL LABS, INC.
as 2:2019cv05654
Defendant:
JUUL LABS, INC.
Plaintiff:
NESHAMINY SCHOOL DISTRICT BUCKS COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
CENTRAL BUCKS SCHOOL DISTRICT BUCKS COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA v. JUUL LABS, INC.
as 2:2019cv05465
Defendant:
JUUL LABS, INC.
Plaintiff:
CENTRAL BUCKS SCHOOL DISTRICT BUCKS COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
QUAKERTOWN COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT BUCKS COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA v. JUUL LABS, INC.
as 2:2019cv05135
Defendant:
JUUL LABS, INC.
Plaintiff:
QUAKERTOWN COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT BUCKS COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
