Cases 41 - 50 of 2,452
Moore v. Xos, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00270
Plaintiff:
Jon Moore
Defendant:
Xos, Inc., Dakota Semler, George N. Mattson and others
USA v. Oronde Shelton
as 24-1322
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ORONDE SHELTON, a/k/a MAN
Raj PatelIn re: Raj Patel
as 24-1337
Petitioner:
In re: RAJ K. PATEL
Respondent:
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE INC
Tang et al v. CITIC Capital Holdings Ltd. et al
as 1:2024cv00198
Plaintiff:
JOHN YONG TANG and Faris Al Kooheji
Defendant:
CITIC CAPITAL HOLDINGS LTD., CITIC Limited, CITIC Capital Partners LLC and others
Counter Defendant:
GNC Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
USA v. Michael Schamach
as 24-1220
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL SCHAMACH, a/k/a Mikhail
ERIE COUNTY, NEW YORK v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY et al
as 2:2024cv00632
Not Yet Classified:
INSULIN PRICING LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
ERIE COUNTY, NEW YORK
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, NOVO NORDISK INC., SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
ONONDAGA COUNTY, NEW YORK v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY et al
as 2:2024cv00646
Not Yet Classified:
INSULIN PRICING LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
ONONDAGA COUNTY, NEW YORK
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, NOVO NORDISK INC., SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
NIAGARA COUNTY, NEW YORK v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY et al
as 2:2024cv00652
Plaintiff:
NIAGARA COUNTY, NEW YORK
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, NOVO NORDISK INC., SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC and others
Not Yet Classified:
INSULIN PRICING LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
USA v. Jawan Oaks
as 24-1185
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JAWAN OAKS, a/k/a KAIRAE OAKS
Thompson v. Hawaiian Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00113
Plaintiff:
John Thompson
Defendant:
Hawaiian Holdings, Inc., Lawrence S. Hershfield, Peter R. Ingram and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
