Cases 41 - 50 of 76
LENNON v. JEFFERSON TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2018cv05724
Plaintiff:
OWEN THOMAS LENNON
Defendant:
JEFFERSON TOWNSHIP, RUSSEL FELTER, TOWNSHIP OF RANDOLPH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv02392
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Third_party_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Third_party_plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
BANKS v. COCAS et al
as 2:2017mc00673
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
DONOVAN COCAS, ADRIAN N. ROE, MCKEE and others
BANKS v. SONG
as 2:2017mc00674
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
SOO SONG, ROBERT CESSAR, MARK R. HORNAK and others
Cause Of Action: no cause specified
BANKS v. ROE et al
as 2:2017mc00619
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
ADRIAN ROE, MARK R. HORNAK, ROBERT CESSAR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BANKS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2017mc00515
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ADRIAN ROE, MARK R. HORNAK and others
BANKS v. DISNEY et al
as 2:2016mc00650
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
DISNEY, DISNEY RESPORTS, ORLANDO POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Kaul v. Christopher J. Christe, Esq. et al
as 2:2016cv02364
Plaintiff:
Richard Arjun Kaul
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER J. CHRISTIE , STATE OF NEW JEREY , Jeffrey Chiesa, Esq. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Kaul v. Christopher J. Christe, Esq. et al
as 3:2016cv02364
Plaintiff:
Richard Arjun Kaul
Defendant:
Christopher J. Christe, Esq., STATE OF NEW JEREY, Jeffrey Chiesa, Esq. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Moreno-Gomez et al v. Ponce-Romay et al
as 1:2016cv00163
Plaintiff:
Ernesto Moreno-Gomez , Total-Pet S.A. , New World Recycle, S.A. and others
Defendant:
Roberto Ponce-Romay, William Muecke, Jose Pablo Cordero and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
