Other Statutes Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 90
DAHIYA v. CHINNI et al
as 3:2015cv05729
Plaintiff: AVISHKAR DAHIYA
Defendant: VENKATA R. CHINNI, BIZSTRIDES, LLC, HERITAGE BABY PRODUCTS LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Jordan v. Sterling Jewelers, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv01417
Plaintiff: Sabrina Jordan
Defendant: Sterling Jewelers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 332
ADKINS v. STERLING INFOSYSTEMS, INC.
as 2:2015cv03888
Defendant: STERLING INFOSYSTEMS, INC.
Plaintiff: TREVOR CHRISTOPHER ADKINS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
KUBIAK v. STERLING JEWELERS, INC.
as 2:2015cv00886
Plaintiff: PATRICIA KUBIAK
Defendant: STERLING JEWELERS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv04478
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
EVANS v. STERLING INFOSYSTEMS, INC.
as 2:2014cv02107
Plaintiff: JESSICA EVANS
Defendant: STERLING INFOSYSTEMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv04375
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
DEJESUS et al v. STERLING CREDIT CORPORATION
as 2:2013cv03523
Plaintiff: PAULETTE DEJESUS and ORLANDO DEJESUS
Defendant: STERLING CREDIT CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
IN RE: SUBOXONE (BUPRENORPHINE HYDROCHLORIDE AND NALOXONE) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
as 2:2013md02445
Defendant: SUBOXONE (BUPRENORPHINE HYDROCHLORIDE AND NALOXONE) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Intervenor: City of Sterling Heights Class Action
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
SMITH v. E-BACKGROUNDCHECKS.COM, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv02775
Plaintiff: TONY SMITH
Defendant: E-BACKGROUNDCHECKS.COM, INC. and STERLING INFOSYSTEMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?