Cases 51 - 60 of 289
Dereyk MorrisIn re: Dereyk Morris
as 22-1315
Petitioner:
In re: DEREYK MORRIS
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv05272
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Shawn SimmsIn re: Shawn Simms
as 21-3101
Petitioner:
In re: SHAWN MICHAEL SIMMS
Respondent:
MORRIS HOUSER, JOHN RIVELLO, TIMOTHY MILLER and others
Plumley v. Extraction Oil & Gas, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01454
Plaintiff:
Patrick Plumley
Defendant:
Extraction Oil & Gas, Inc., Thomas B. Tyree, Jr., Benjamin Dell and others
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. v. THOMAS LOUNGE INCORPORATED et al
as 2:2021cv01295
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
THOMAS LOUNGE INCORPORATED, DARREN L. MORRIS, THEODORE R. MORRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
Andre Morris v. Attorney General United States
as 21-2558
Petitioner:
ANDRE JAMAL MORRIS
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Yonel Baptiste v. Kathryn Morris, et al
as 21-2248
Plaintiff / Appellant:
YONEL JEAN BAPTISTE
Defendant / Appellee:
KATHRYN MORRIS, PsyD, MARWIN REEVES, Treatment Specialist, M. RODARMEL, Unit Manager and others
LAUREL SCHOOL DISTRICT v. JUUL LABS, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv00802
Defendant:
JAMES MONSEES, ADAM BOWEN, RIAZ VALANI and others
Plaintiff:
LAUREL SCHOOL DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
LAWRENCE COUNTY CAREER & TECHNICAL CENTER v. JUUL LABS, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv00707
Defendant:
JAMES MONSEES, ADAM BOWEN, RIAZ VALANI and others
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE COUNTY CAREER & TECHNICAL CENTER
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
F. H., et al v. West Morris Regional High Sch, et al
as 21-2028
Defendant / Appellee:
WEST MORRIS REGIONAL HIGH SCHOOL BOARD OF EDUCATION, COMMISSIONER ANGELICA ALLEN MCMILLAN, in her official and individual capacity, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
M. H., J. H. and F. H.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
