Cases 51 - 60 of 72
CUTRUFELLO et al v. D'ALONZO et al
as 2:2012cv05565
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH CUTRUFELLO , PIERRE & CARLO, INC. and PIERRE & CARLO GLEN MILLS, , LLC
Defendant:
CHRISTINE D'ALONZO , MATTHEW T. D'ALONZO and AMELIA PARIS SALON & SPA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Dave Pierre v. Attorney General United State
as 12-3773
Petitioner:
DAVE SILVESTER PIERRE, AKA David Pier, AKA David Piere, AKA David S. Pierre, Lionel A. Escobar
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv04573
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Johnny Pierre v. Attorney General United State
as 12-2536
Petitioner:
JOHNNY JOSEPH PIERRE
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02341
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
ACKOUREY v. ANDRE LANI CUSTOM CLOTHIERS et al
as 2:2012cv01686
Plaintiff:
RICHARD C. ACKOUREY, JR.
Defendant:
ANDRE LANI CUSTOM CLOTHIERS, ASHOK B. KHEMLANI, MOSANTI TAILORS and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
JACKSON v. THE DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY et al
as 2:2011cv06194
Plaintiff:
MARK JACKSON
Defendant:
THE DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY , ROHM AND HAAS COMPANY , ROHM AND HAAS COMPANY BENEFITS ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
NEW HAMPSHIRE INSURANCE COMPANY v. MA et al
as 2:2011cv05152
Defendant:
XIAO YING MA, TRONG D. NGUYEN, ESTATE OF TROY D. NGUYEN and others
Plaintiff:
NEW HAMPSHIRE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Pierre Joseph v. Hess Oil VI Corp
as 11-2800
Plaintiff - Respondent:
PIERRE P. JOSEPH
Defendant - Petitioner:
HESS OIL VI CORP
Pierre Joseph v. Hess Oil VI Corp
as 11-8026
Plaintiff - Respondent:
PIERRE P. JOSEPH
Defendant - Petitioner:
HESS OIL VI CORP
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
