Cases 61 - 70 of 88
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. BURNS
as 2:2013mc00020
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
TIMOTHY BURNS
Cause Of Action: Motion for Order
Sikkelee v. Precision Airmotive Corporatio, et al
as 12-8081
Plaintiff - Respondent:
JILL SIKKELEE, individually and as personal representative of the Estate of David Sikkelee, Deceased
Defendant - Respondent:
PRECISION AIRMOTIVE CORPORATION, PRECISION AIRMOTIVE LLC, individually and as Successor-in-Interest to Precision Airmotive Corporation, BURNS INTERNATIONAL SERVICES CORPORATION, individually and as Successor-in-Interest to Borg-Warner Corporation, and Marvel-Schebler, a Division of Borg-Warner Corporation and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
AVCO CORPORATION
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv02075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
REASSURE AMERICA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. MIDWEST RESOURCES, LTD.
as 2:2012mc00085
Plaintiff:
REASSURE AMERICA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
MIDWEST RESOURCES, LTD.
Movant:
ELIZABETH BURNS and BURNS FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Type:
Other Statutes
BURNS v. TRANS UNION, LLC et al
as 2:2012cv00913
Plaintiff:
GERALD JAY BURNS
Defendant:
TRANS UNION, LLC and WAKEFIELD & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
In Re: Pharmacy Benefit, et al
as 12-1430
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BELLEVUE DRUG CO, ROBERT SCHREIBER INC, DBA Burns Pharmacy and REHN HUERBINGER DRUG, DBA Parkway Drugs, on behalf of Themselves and all others similarly situated
Plaintiff - Appellee:
PHARM FREEDOM FUND and NATL COMM PHARM ASSN
Defendant - Appellee:
CAREMARKSPCS, FKA AdvancePCS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv01671
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
USA v. Perry Burn
as 10-2529
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
PERRY BURNS, AKA Amigo
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
