Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Bhavsar et al v. Fulop et al
as 1:2023cv01339
Plaintiff:
Denish Bhavsar and Samhita Gera
Defendant:
Ric Fulop, James Haley, Ali El Siblani and others
Nominal Defendant:
Desktop Metal, Inc.
Wheeler v. Velodyne Lidar, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01641
Plaintiff:
Jacob Wheeler
Defendant:
Velodyne Lidar, Inc., Virginia Boulet, Michael Dee and others
MALLOZZI v. INNOVATIVE INDUSTRIAL PROPERTIES, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv02359
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL V. MALLOZZI and STEPHEN R. FORRESTER
Defendant:
INNOVATIVE INDUSTRIAL PROPERTIES, INC., PAUL SMITHERS, CATHERINE HASTINGS and others
Petitioner:
FELIX MOZOCKIE, LINDA MOZOCKIE, ALEX FREDERICK and others
Lead Plaintiff:
ALEJANDRO HANDAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00535
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00535
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
WATERMAN v. COHERENT, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv02623
Plaintiff:
MARC WATERMAN
Defendant:
II-VI INCORPORATED, BEVERLY KAY MATTHEWS, MICHAEL MCMULLEN and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
SHIREY v. COHERENT, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv10698
Defendant:
BEVERLY KAY MATTHEWS, GARRY ROGERSON, COHERENT, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
JOSH SHIREY
Andy Buxton v. Attorney General Pennsylvania
as 21-1714
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDY BUXTON
Defendant / Appellee:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY ALLEGHENY COUNTY, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and SUPERINTENDENT MERCER SCI
USA v. Andnet Shimeles
as 21-1199
Defendant / Appellant:
ANDNET SHIMELES, a/k/a "Andy," a/k/a "Steven Howard," a/k/a Chris Wright" a/k/a "Mark Brown"
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Jose Castro Gomez v. Attorney General United States
as 20-2587
Petitioner:
JOSE ALEXANDER CASTRO GOMEZ, AKA Junior Castro, AKA Andy Gomez, AKA Jose Castro, AKA Junior Castro
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
