Cases 1 - 10 of 275
Lucille Farrell-Scott, et al v. Committee of Managers of Llewellyn Park, et al
as 24-1965
Plaintiff:
LUCILLE FARRELL-SCOTT and SUNNE-RYSE SMITH
Defendant:
COMMITTEE OF MANAGERS OF LLEWELLYN PARK and TRUSTEES OF LLEWELLYN PARK
DELAWARE RIVERKEEPER NETWORK et al v. Sams et al
as 2:2024cv01547
Plaintiff:
DELAWARE RIVERKEEPER NETWORK and MAYA K. VAN ROSSUM
Defendant:
Charles F. Sams, III, NATIONAL PARK SERVICE and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
SOTEFIN S.A. v. PARK PLUS, INC.
as 2:2024cv04735
Petitioner:
SOTEFIN S.A.
Respondent:
PARK PLUS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Loan
Aisha Bradley
as 24-1357
Petitioner:
In re: AISHA ASHA BRADLEY
Respondent:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, SUMMIT PARK EAST GP, UNIVERSITY CITY HOUSING CO and others
Aisha Bradley
as 24-1355
Petitioner:
In re: AISHA ASHA BRADLEY
Respondent:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, SUMMIT PARK EAST GP, UNIVERSITY CITY HOUSING CO and others
Aisha Bradley
as 24-1356
Petitioner:
In re: AISHA ASHA BRADLEY
Respondent:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, SUMMIT PARK EAST GP, UNIVERSITY CITY HOUSING CO and others
PARK v. PHILADELPHIA CREDIT UNION
as 2:2024cv00896
Plaintiff:
PHOEBE PARK
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA CREDIT UNION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
City of Philadelphia v. Aisha Bradley, et al
as 24-1211
Plaintiff:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Defendant:
AISHA ASHA BRADLEY, UNIVERSITY CITY HOUSING CO, JUDGE PATRICK F. DUGAN, State Employee and others
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA v. BRADLEY et al
as 2:2024cv00269
Plaintiff:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Defendant:
AISHA ASHA BRADLEY, SUMMIT PARK EAST, GP, UNIVERSITY CITY HOUSING CO and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
In re: Palani Karupaiyan
as 24-1067
Petitioner:
In re: PALANI KARUPAIYAN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, TOWNSHIP OF WOODBRIDGE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
