Cases 1 - 10 of 428
Kenneth ThorntonIn re: Kenneth Thornton
as 24-1941
Petitioner:
In re: KENNETH E. THORNTON
Respondent:
BEAVER COUNTY DETECTIVES OFFICE, in her official capacity, PETER CARBONE, in his individual and official capacity, MARLENE EVERETTE, in her individual and official capacity and others
Defendant:
LISA JONES, in her individual capacity and SHARON D. BUCKLEY, in her individual capacity
Ayers v. iRhythm Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00593
Defendant:
Renee Budig, Quentin Blackford, Douglas J. Devine and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick Ayers
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05898
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
In re: Walmart Inc. Securities Litigation, et al, et al
as 24-1818
Plaintiff:
KIM KENGLE, as trustee of the Kim K.Kengle 2000 Trust and ROSEANNE LACY
Defendant:
WALMART INC, C. DOUGLAS MCMILLON and M. BRETT BIGGS, JR.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01421
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
GELBER v. BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF ILLINOIS et al
as 2:2024cv04236
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS GELBER, HACKENSACK DENTAL ASSOCIATES, DOUGLAS GELBER, DMD, LLC and others
Defendant:
BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF ILLINOIS, HEALTH CARE SERVICES CORPORATION, DENTAL NETWORK OF AMERICA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 185 Suit to Compel Arbitration
LU v. KERRY et al
as 2:2024cv01169
Plaintiff:
FRIEDRICH LU
Defendant:
CAMERON F KERRY, UNITED STATES, MERRICK GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Douglas Menjivar Mejia, et al v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1183
Petitioner:
DOUGLAS JAVIER MENJIVAR MEJIA, RUTH NOEMY RIVERA DE MENJIVAR, BRANDON STEVEN GAMEZ RIVERA and others
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
