Cases 1 - 10 of 362
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04912
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
APPLICATION FOR EXEMPTION FROM THE ELECTRONIC PUBLIC ACCESS FEES BY Professor Alexander Zentefis
as 2:2024mc00046
Unknown:
APPLICATION FOR EXEMPTION FROM THE ELECTRONIC PUBLIC ACCESS FEES BY Professor Alexander Zentefis
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Gregory Morino v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
as 24-2234
Respondent:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Petitioner:
GREGORY ALEXANDER MORINO
Carlos Suazo Nunez v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-2126
Petitioner:
CARLOS ALEXANDER SUAZO NUNEZ
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
KELLNER v. EMPOSIMATO et al
as 2:2024cv06675
Defendant:
ALEXANDER EMPOSIMATO and DOUBLEDAY OFFICE LIQUIDATION
Plaintiff:
JACOB KELLNER
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Magno Guerrero-Guerrero, et al v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-2012
Petitioner:
MAGNO JOSELITO GUERRERO-GUERRERO, SONIA ESPERANZA TAPIA-CUESTA and JOFFRE ALEXANDER GUERRERO-TAPIA
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02346
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Juan Argueta-Portillo v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1886
Petitioner:
JUAN ALEXANDER ARGUETA-PORTILLO
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05304
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Manuel Zuna-Paramo, et al v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1680
Petitioner:
MANUEL ALEXANDER ZUNA-PARAMO, DEISY ANGELICA GUAMAN-BONILLA and D. S. Z.-G.
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
