Cases 1 - 10 of 24
USA v. Vincent Chan-Guillen
as 23-3183
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
VINCENT CHAN-GUILLEN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv20789
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
SUN TAIYANG CO., LTD. v. DAE DO INC. et al
as 2:2023cv03614
Plaintiff:
SUN TAIYANG CO., LTD.
Defendant:
DAE DO INC., MINSOO CHO, SUNG CHAN HONG and others
AIRTECH INTERNATIONAL INC v. YIM et al
as 2:2022cv00668
Plaintiff:
AIRTECH INTERNATIONAL INC
Defendant:
BYUNG CHAN YIM, HYO SUN KIM, ASSURED COMPONENTS LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
James McGuckin MD, et alIn re: James McGuckin MD, et al
as 21-2279
Petitioner:
In re: JAMES MCGUCKIN, M.D. and VASCULAR ACCESS CENTERS LLC
Debtor:
VASCULAR ACCESS CENTERS LP
Trustee:
STEPHEN V. FALANGA
Respondent:
WILLIAM WHITFIELD GARDNER and ASHELY M. CHAN
Hayriye Gok v. Roman Catholic Church, et al
as 21-1897
Defendant / Appellee:
TRINITY HEALTH CATHOLIC HEALTH EAST, ARCHDIOCESE OF PHILADELPHIA, STANLEY CHAN and others
Defendant:
PAM FIERRO and ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HAYRIYE BERIL GOK
GOK v. ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH et al
as 2:2020cv04817
Plaintiff:
HAYIRYE BERIL GOK
Defendant:
OLEG TEYTELBOYM, ALAN J DAVIS, CATHY MIKUS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Myers v. Adesto Technologies Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv00459
Defendant:
Susan Uthayakumar, Herve Fages, Narbeh Derhacobian and others
Plaintiff:
John Myers
Rosenblatt v. Adesto Technologies Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv00401
Defendant:
Susan Uthayakumar, Herve Fages, Narbeh Derhacobian and others
Plaintiff:
Jordan Rosenblatt
Kent v. Avon Products, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv01959
Plaintiff:
Michael Kent
Defendant:
Susan J. Kropf, Michael F. Sanford, James A. Mitarotonda and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
