Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Urve MaggittiIn re: Urve Maggitti
as 24-1660
Petitioner:
In re: URVE MAGGITTI
Respondent:
BRET M. BINDER, DEBRA RYAN, DANIEL E. ROLAND and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv07544
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv19187
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Healthcare Services Group Inc v. Skyline Services Group LLC, et al
as 20-2808
Defendant:
BEDFORD GARDENS CARE AND REHABILITATION CENTER LLC, NEBRASKA CITY CARE AND REHABILITATION CENTER LLC, NEODESHA CARE AND REHABILITATION CENTER SNF and others
Defendant / Appellant:
LOUIS SCHWARTZ, JOSEPH SCHWARTZ, MICHAEL SCHWARTZ and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
HEALTHCARE SERVICES GROUP INC
Cynthia Kannady, et al v. Johnson & Johnson Inc, et al
as 20-2581
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON INC, PTI UNION LLC, DBA Pharma Tech Industries, PTI ROYSTON LLC, DBA Pharma Tech Industries and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CYNTHIA KANNADY
Plaintiff:
DEBBIE AHLBORN
Debbie Gore, et al v. Bruce Nagel, et al
as 20-1710
Defendant / Appellee:
DEREK POTTS, NAGEL RICE, BAILEY PEAVEY BAILEY COWAN HECKAMAN PLLC and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEBBIE GORE, on behalf of herself and all other similarly situated and DORIS LANCE SMITH
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00240
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01431
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
GILES v. MRS BPO, LLC
as 1:2019cv06907
Plaintiff:
DEBBIE GILES
Defendant:
MRS BPO, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
JOHNSTON v. EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.
as 2:2015cv05919
Plaintiff:
DEBBIE JOHNSTON
Defendant:
EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
