Cases 1 - 10 of 135
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06493
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Thompson v. Hawaiian Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00113
Plaintiff:
John Thompson
Defendant:
Hawaiian Holdings, Inc., Lawrence S. Hershfield, Peter R. Ingram and others
Vernon McGinnis, Jr.In re: Vernon McGinnis, Jr.
as 24-1056
Petitioner:
In re: VERNON EARL MCGINNIS, JR.
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY ARMSTRONG COUNTY
Devon Earl v. Brandon Harris, et al
as 23-1063
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEVON AUSTIN EARL, sui juris
Defendant / Appellee:
BRANDON HARRIS, Badge #2918, in his individual and official capacity as Police Officer of New Castle County Police Department, ALEXANDER PETERSON, in his individual and official capacity as Magistrate of Justice of the Peace Court No. 11, C. TEMPLE, Clerk (New Castle Clerk of the Peace) in her individual and official capacity as Clerk of New Castle County Justice of the Peace Courty No. 11 and others
USA v. Robert Martin
as 22-3402
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ROBERT EARL MARTIN
Earl v. Harris et al
as 1:2022cv01026
Plaintiff:
Devon Austin Earl
Defendant:
Brandon Harris, Alexander Peterson, III, "Ctemple, Clerk" (New Castle Clerk of the Peace) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02913
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Stanfield v. Fritzlen
as 1:2022cv00921
Petitioner:
Earl Richard, Jr. and Earl Richard Stanfield, Jr.
Respondent:
Bill Fritzlen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Kent v. LHC Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00718
Plaintiff:
Michael Kent
Defendant:
LHC Group, Inc., Keith G. Myers, Monica F. Azare and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
