Cases 1 - 10 of 22
LAZAR v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY
as 2:2023cv02957
Plaintiff:
RICHARD LAZAR
Defendant:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
MCCOY v. THOR MOTOR COACH, INC. et al
as 3:2022cv01589
Plaintiff:
JAMES C MCCOY
Defendant:
THOR MOTOR COACH, INC. and FORD MOTOR COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv03416
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640 Truth in Lending
NEIMEISTER v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY et al
as 1:2021cv06097
Defendant:
READING TRUCK BODY, LLC and FORD MOTOR COMPANY
Plaintiff:
BRETT NEIMEISTER
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv04512
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
FENCL v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY
as 1:2019cv14714
Defendant:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY
Plaintiff:
KEITH FENCL
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
NAPIER v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY
as 1:2019cv14639
Plaintiff:
MARK NAPIER
Defendant:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
In re Application of WG TOPCO S.a.r.l for an Order Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1782 to Conduct Discovery for Use in a Foreign Proceeding
as 1:2018mc00126
Defendant:
Application of WG TOPCO S.a.r.l for an Order Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1782 to Conduct Discovery for Use in a Foreign Proceeding
Respondent:
Ford Motor Company
Petitioner:
WG TOPCO S.a r.l
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CABOT CORPORATION et al
as 3:2013cv07564
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CABOT CORPORATION , CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION , INTERNATIONAL FLAVORS AND FRAGRANCES INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9613
HUFF et al v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY
as 5:2013cv02168
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HUFF , CHARLES ZAFONTE and LORI ZAFONTE
Defendant:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
