Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1075
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
USA v. Terrence Gibbs
as 21-3025
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
TERRENCE GIBBS
Amin Gibbs v. Superintendent Pine Grove SCI, et al
as 21-1982
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AMIN GIBBS
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT PINE GROVE SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00667
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Fastship LLC, et al v. Lockheed Martin Corp, et al
as 20-3529
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FASTSHIP LLC and LIQUIDATING TRUST OF FASTSHIP INC
Defendant / Appellee:
GIBBS & COX INC, Jointly, severally, and in the alternative and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP
In re: Universal Health Services Inc
as 20-2087
Appellee:
In re: UNIVERSAL HEALTH SERVICES INC, DERIVATIVE LITIGATION
Defendant / Appellee:
DEBRA K. OSTEEN, ALAN B. MILLER, ANTHONY PANTALEONI and others
Appellant:
LONGVIEW LARGECAP 500 INDEX VEBA FUND, TRUSTEE OF THE LONGVIEW BROAD MARKET 3000 INDEX FUND, CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF CLINTON POLICE & FIRE PENSION FUND and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AMALGAMATED BANK and CAMBRIDGE RETIREMENT SYSTEM
Plaintiff:
WATERFORD TOWNSHIP POLICE & FIRE RETIREMENT SYSTEM
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CENTRAL LABORERS' PENSION FUND
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02013
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Christopher Gibbs v. City of Pittsburgh
as 20-1414
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER GIBBS
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH
Robert Mickens v. Michael Clark, et al
as 19-3292
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS MOOK, Maintenance Manager, In Their Individual and Official Capacities, MICHAEL EDWARDS, RN Supervisor, GLORIA GIBBS, RN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT MICKENS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
