Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Humphreys v. Loan Depot, LLC
as 1:2024cv00357
Plaintiff:
Heidi Bourdon Humphreys
Defendant:
Loan Depot, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Malone v. Icosavax, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Anthony Malone
Defendant:
Icosavax, Inc., Peter Kolchinsky, Heidi Kunz and others
NABLI v. BRYSON et al
as 2:2022cv02839
Plaintiff:
Mohamed Heidi Nabli
Defendant:
DISTRICT DIRECTOR TONY BRYSON, UR M. JADDOU and SECRETARY ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Maritime Subsidy Board
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01064
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Eugene Nicholas, et al v. Jeffrey Snider, et al
as 21-1675
Defendant / Appellant:
MEDIO CIELO LLC, VALERIE SNIDER, CAV FARMS INC and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LYNN R. HOTTLE, individually and d/b/a Hottle Livestock, HEIDI L. WORDEN, individually and d/b/a Nichola Farms and EUGENE NICHOLAS, individually and d/b/a Nicholas Farms
Myron Moton v. Wetzel, et al
as 20-2432
Defendant:
DEPUTY MAZUKIEWIEZ, MICHAEL BEAL, DAVY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MYRON MOTON
Warren Kraft v. Fein Such Kahn & Sheppard PC, et al
as 20-2178
Defendant / Appellee:
VINCENT DIMAILO, JR., MICHAEL S. HANUSEK, PHILIP A. KAHN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WARREN R. KRAFT
Muhammad Aliahmed, et al v. May, et al
as 20-2130
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL GEORGE T. LEES, III, LT. LEWIS R. BUCKLE, JR., CHAPLAIN GUS CHRISTO and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MUHAMMAD ALIAHMED and HERMIONE KELLY IVY WINTER, a/k/a Evonca Sakinah S. Aliahmed a/k/a David Allen Allemandi
Myron Moton v. John Wetzel, et al
as 19-2773
Defendant:
DEPUTY MAZUKIEWIEZ, MICHAEL BEAL, LIEUTENANT SUPERVISED CELL EXTRACTION TEAM UNIT and others
Defendant / Appellee:
SGT. SWIFT
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MYRON MOTON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
