Cases 1 - 10 of 12
USA v. John Adams
as 22-2508
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JOHN ADAMS
Adams v. MyoKardia, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv01445
Defendant:
David Meeker, Wendy Yarno, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and others
Plaintiff:
John Adams
In re: Kenneth Mitan, et al
as 14-3207
Defendant - Petitioner:
In re: KENNETH MITAN, also known as John Hill also known as Police Officer, Sgt. John Miller also known as John Thompson also known as John Adams
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Nominal Respondent:
MICHAEL M. BAYLSON
USA v. Kenneth Mitan
as 14-3104
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
KENNETH MITAN, also known as John Hill also known as Police Officer, Sgt. John Miller also known as John Thompson also known as John Adams
John Adams v. Christine Marque, et al
as 11-1045
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN ADAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTINE MARQUE, YVES MARQUE, PA MAGISTERAL CT and others
ADAMS v. MARQUE et al
as 2:2011cv00034
Plaintiff:
JOHN ADAMS
Defendant:
CHRISTINE MARQUE, YVES MARQUE, DELAWARE COUNTY, PA CONTABLE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
USA v. Kenneth Mitan
as 10-2192
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
KENNETH MITAN, also known as JOHN HILL also known as POLICE OFFICER, SGT. JOHN MILLER also known as JOHN THOMPSON also known as JOHN ADAMS
-JS In Re: BAYSIDE LITIGATION, et al v. , et al
as 1:1997cv05127
Defendant:
BAYSIDE STATE PRISON , ROBERT ROES 1 TO 50 , JOHN SMITHS 1 TO 15 and others
Plaintiff:
TONY BACON , ANDREW GORDON , MICHAEL S. SHONTZ and others
Consol_defendant:
CLEMENT , MYERS , JOHN CONESKY and others
Pecial_master:
JOHN W. BISSELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
USA v. Kenneth Mitan
as 09-3610
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
KENNETH MITAN, a/k/a John Hill a/k/a Police Officer, Sgt. John Miller, a/k/a John Thompson a/k/a John Adams
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
