Cases 1 - 6 of 6
BRAND ENERGY & INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES, INC. et al v. IREX CONTRACTING GROUP et al
as 5:2016cv02499
Defendant:
IREX CONTRACTING GROUP, VERTICAL ACCESS SOLUTIONS, LLC, PRIME INDUSTRIAL ACCESS, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BRAND ENERGY & INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES, INC, BRAND ENERGY & INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES, INC., BRAND ENERGY SERVICES, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
BRAND ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES, INC. et al v. IREX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2017mc01057
Plaintiff:
BRAND ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES, INC. , BRAND ENERGY SERVICES, LLC , BRAND SERVICES, LLC and others
Defendant:
IREX CORPORATION, VERTICAL ACCESS SOLUTIONS, LLC, PRIME INDUSTRIAL ACCESS, LLC and others
Movant:
JOSEPH D'ULISSE
RICHARDSON v. PITTSBURGH CORNING CORP. et al
as 2:2010cv83630
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM H. RICHARDSON
Defendant:
PITTSBURGH CORNING CORP., EAGLE PICHER INDUSTRIES INC., RAYMARK INDUSTRIES INC. and others
KERSTETER v. RAYBESTOS-MANHATTEN, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv79779
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA KERSTETER
Defendant:
RAYBESTOS-MANHATTEN, INC., GAF CORPORATION, H.K. PORTER, INC. and others
ARNOLD v. BATTERY STEAMSHIP CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv37873
Plaintiff:
ORDE E. ARNOLD
Defendant:
BATTERY STEAMSHIP CORPORATION, ISBRANDTSEN TANKERS, JAS. W. ELWELL COMPANY and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
CSX TRANSPORTATION, INCORPORATED , TEXACO INC , CHARLES KURZ AND COMPANY, INCORPORATED and others
Thirdparty_defendant:
PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION , MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND , KEENE CORP and others
KENNEDY INDUSTRIES, INC. v. APARO et al
as 2:2004cv05967
Plaintiff:
KENNEDY INDUSTRIES, INC.
Defendant:
BRIAN APARO, DRIVING FORCE, LLC, IMBODY, INC. and others
Cross Claimant:
SOUTHERN TIER ATHLETICS
Counter Claimant:
WORLDWIDE SPORT SUPPLY and JAMES KEEN, SR.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
