Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Christian Diez v. Thomas Ervelli, et al
as 19-2179
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CHRISTIAN DIEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
VICTOR TABARANZA, (a New Jersey State Trooper), MATTHEW DIVITTORIO, (a New Jersey State Trooper), NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF LAW AND PUBLIC SAFETY, Division of State Police and others
Defendant / Appellant:
M. J. BUTLER, (a New Jersey State Trooper), RICHARD ALAM, (a Sergeant in the New Jersey State Police) and THOMAS J. ERVELLI, (a New Jersey State Trooper)
Ever Bedoya, et al v. American Eagle Express Inc
as 17-8053
Defendant - Petitioner:
AMERICAN EAGLE EXPRESS INC, DBA Aex Group
Plaintiff - Respondent:
EVER BEDOYA, DIEGO GONZALES and MANUEL DECASTRO, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Third Party - Respondent:
KV SERVICE LLC, M & J EXPRESS LLC and A & D DELIVERY EXPRESS LLC
L. R.N., et al v. Attorney General United State
as 17-1159
Petitioner:
L. C. R.N. and M. J. R.N.
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL 825 EMPLOYEE BENEFIT FUNDS AND THE TRUSTEES THEREOF v. G M J C CONSTRUCTION CORP.
as 2:2013cv06201
Petitioner:
INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL 825 EMPLOYEE BENEFIT FUNDS AND THE TRUSTEES THEREOF
Respondent:
G M J C CONSTRUCTION CORP.
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
NEW JERSEY REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS AND NEW JERSEY CARPENTERS FUNDS AND THE TRUSTEES THEREOF v. M&J CEILING, INC.
as 1:2013cv01779
Petitioner:
NEW JERSEY REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS AND NEW JERSEY CARPENTERS FUNDS AND THE TRUSTEES THEREOF
Respondent:
M&J CEILING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Loan
BARTEL et al v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2010cv40956
Plaintiff:
WILLARD E. BARTEL and DAVID C. PEEBLES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ACMC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
