Cases 1 - 10 of 513
Derrick, et al v. Glen Mills Schools, et al
as 24-8018
Petitioner:
DERRICK, Through and With His Next Friend and Mother Tina, WALTER, Through and With His Next Friend and Mother Janeva and THOMAS, Through His Next Friend and Mother Michelle, On Behalf of Themselves and Others Similarly Situated
Respondent:
GLEN MILLS SCHOOLS, TERESA D. MILLER, Secretary of the Pennsylvania Department of Human Services in Her Individual Capacity, THEODORE DALLAS, Former Secretary of The Department of Human Services in His Individual Capacity and others
MILLER v. APPLE, INC.
as 2:2024cv06427
Plaintiff:
JOHN MILLER
Defendant:
APPLE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01511
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Feinberg v. Chardo et al
as 1:2024cv00706
Plaintiff:
Hadassah Feinberg
Defendant:
Francis Chardo, Colin Zwally, Michelle Avery and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Miller v. Juniper Networks, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00332
Plaintiff:
James Miller
Defendant:
Juniper Networks, Inc., Rami Rahim, Anne Delsanto and others
Miller v. County of Lancaster et al
as 1:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
Michael Miller
Defendant:
County of Lancaster and Office of Open Records
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Miller v. Ambrx Biopharma, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00192
Plaintiff:
Bruce Miller
Defendant:
Ambrx Biopharma, Inc., Stephen Glover, Daniel O'Connor and others
MILLER v. EAGLE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv23011
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS MILLER
Defendant:
EAGLE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., SCOTT TARIFF and BRIAN CAHILL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04924
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
