Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01227
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 3001 Federal Debt Collection Act
Fong v. Singh et al
as 1:2017cv01806
Plaintiff:
Kevin Fong
Defendant:
Manish Singh, Michael Handelman, Elma Hawkins and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
HINES v. CONVERGENT OUTSOURCING, INC.
as 2:2017cv00768
Plaintiff:
MAYNARD HINES
Defendant:
CONVERGENT OUTSOURCING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
MAYNARD, JR. v. TRANS UNION, LLC et al
as 2:2014cv01946
Plaintiff:
ROY MAYNARD, JR.
Defendant:
TRANS UNION, LLC , EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC, EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
USA v. Dawan Maynard
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 14-1489
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DAWAN MAYNARD
Pinchuck v. Rogers et al
as 1:2012cv01367
Plaintiff:
Warren Pinchuck
Defendant:
James E. Rogers, Michael G. Browning, G. Alex Barnhardt, Sr. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01353
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Desmond Maynard v. VI Comm Labor, et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 10-3476
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DESMOND L. MAYNARD
Defendant - Appellee:
VI COMM LABOR and CHERYL MARTIN-LIBURD
TOWNSHIP OF COLTS NECK v. DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY et al
as 3:2009cv03130
Plaintiff:
TOWNSHIP OF COLTS NECK
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, THE HONORABLE RAY MAYBUS, SECRETARY OF THE UNITED STATES NAVY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4332 Environmental Policy - Coop of Agency Repo
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.