Cases 1 - 10 of 51
MEDINA v. NCB MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.
as 2:2023cv01270
Plaintiff:
ERNESTO MEDINA
Defendant:
NCB MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2721 Federal Drivers Privacy Protection Act
Fernando Flores Medina v. Attorney General United States of America
as 23-1175
Petitioner:
FERNANDO FLORES MEDINA
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Morlin Vindel-Medina v. Attorney General United States of America
as 22-1879
Petitioner:
MORLIN ENRIQUE VINDEL-MEDINA
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Ahmed v. Alvarez et al
as 1:2021cv00618
Nominal Defendant:
Stride, Inc. and K
Defendant:
Steven B. Fink, Victoria D. Harker, Robert L. Cohen and others
Plaintiff:
Wajid Ahmed
MUELLER v. BROADWAY FINANCIAL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2021cv00975
Defendant:
ERIN SELLECK, VIRGIL ROBERTS, DUTCH C ROSS, III and others
Plaintiff:
DEREK MUELLER
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Plumley v. Broadway Financial Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv00290
Defendant:
Daniel A. Medina, Jack T. Thompson, Erin Selleck and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick Plumley
Christian Orellana-Medina v. Attorney General United States
as 21-1247
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
CHRISTIAN OSMANY ORELLANA-MEDINA
Lopez v. Broadway Financial Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv00157
Defendant:
Daniel A. Medina, Jack T. Thompson, Erin Selleck and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Lopez
Shemen et al v. Alvarez et al
as 1:2020cv01731
Nominal Defendant:
Stride, Inc. and K
Defendant:
Steven B. Fink, Victoria D. Harker, Robert L. Cohen and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Shemen and Gary Feldman
Jhon Lora, et al v. Baylor, et al
as 20-3297
Defendant / Appellee:
MR. ARMOND, Sgt. at Monroe County Correctional Facility, LT. BAYLOR, Director of Monroe County Correctional Facility, GARY HAIDLE, Warden of Monroe County Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAMAON WEBSTER, JUSTIN COATE, JHON LORA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
