Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2189
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Omar Espinal, et al v. Bobs Discount Furniture LLC, et al
as 23-8003
Respondent:
OMAR A. ESPINAL, OSCAR RENE CALDERON-ROMERO, WELLINGTON TORRES and others
Petitioner:
BOBS DISCOUNT FURNITURE LLC and RXO LAST MILE INC
Hopkins v. CDK Global, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00859
Plaintiff:
Matthew Hopkins
Defendant:
CDK Global, Inc., Leslie A. Brun, Brian Krzanich and others
WHITFIELD v. CDK GLOBAL, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv01729
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WHITFIELD
Defendant:
CDK GLOBAL, INC., LESLIE A BRUN, BRIAN KRZANICH and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. ยง 22 Securities Fraud
Morgan v. CDK Global, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00602
Plaintiff:
Anthony Morgan
Defendant:
CDK Global, Inc., Leslie A. Brun, Willie A. Deese and others
FONTAINE v. ELECTRIC LAST MILE SOLUTIONS, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv01902
Plaintiff:
PIERRE FONTAINE
Defendant:
ELECTRIC LAST MILE SOLUTIONS, INC., JAMES TAYLOR, JASON LUO and others
In Re:
ELECTRIC LAST MILE SOLUTIONS, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION
FONTAINE v. ELECTRIC LAST MILE SOLUTIONS, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv01902
Plaintiff:
PIERRE FONTAINE
Defendant:
ELECTRIC LAST MILE SOLUTIONS, INC., JAMES TAYLOR, JASON LUO and others
HACKER v. ELECTRIC LAST MILE SOLUTIONS INC. et al
as 2:2022cv00545
Defendant:
ELECTRIC LAST MILE SOLUTIONS INC., FORUM MERGER III CORP., JAMES TAYLOR and others
Plaintiff:
SCOTT T. HACKER
Elijah WeirIn re: Elijah Weir
as 21-1955
Respondent:
BARRY R. SMITH, "Superintendant" at SCI-Houtzdale facility, B. J. SOLOMAN, "Deputy-Superintendant" at SCIHoutzdale, JOEL BARROWS, "Major Officer" at SCI-Houtzdale and others
Petitioner:
In re: ELIJAH WEIR
MILES v. COOPER TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY et al
as 2:2021cv06762
Defendant:
COOPER TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY, JOHN J. HOLLAND, TRACEY I. JOUBERT and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY MILES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
