Cases 1 - 10 of 36
UNIVERSAL TURBINE PARTS, LLC v. PRATT & WHITNEY CANADA CORP. et al
as 2:2024cv02021
Plaintiff:
UNIVERSAL TURBINE PARTS, LLC
Defendant:
PRATT & WHITNEY CANADA CORP., Pratt & Whitney Canada Holdings Corp. and P&WC Turbo Engines Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Richard Silverberg v. DuPont De Nemours Inc, et al
as 24-1775
Plaintiff:
RICHARD J. SILVERBERG, Esq.
Defendant:
DUPONT DE NEMOURS INC, DOW INC, CORTEVA INC and others
Richard Silverberg v. DuPont De Nemours Inc, et al
as 24-1774
Plaintiff:
RICHARD J. SILVERBERG, Esq.
Defendant:
DUPONT DE NEMOURS INC, DOW INC, CORTEVA INC and others
SILVERBERG v. DUPONT DE NEMOURS INC. et al
as 2:2024cv00924
Plaintiff:
RICHARD J. SILVERBERG
Defendant:
DUPONT DE NEMOURS INC., DOW, INC., CORTEVA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
SILVERBERG v. DUPONT DE NEMOURS, INC et al
as 2:2023cv01868
Plaintiff:
RICHARD J. SILVERBERG
Defendant:
DUPONT DE NEMOURS INC., DOW, INC., CORTEVA, INC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Berezin v. Croskrey et al
as 1:2023cv00149
Plaintiff:
Samuel Berezin
Defendant:
Stephen E. Croskrey, John A. Dowdy, III, Richard Hendrix and others
Nominal Defendant:
Danimer Scientific, Inc.
STIFEL, NICOLAUS & COMPANY, INCORPORATED v. PRATT
as 2:2022cv03250
Petitioner:
STIFEL, NICOLAUS & COMPANY, INCORPORATED
Respondent:
JOSEPH HERSEY PRATT
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Loan
Walker v. SPX FLOW, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00218
Plaintiff:
Adam Walker
Defendant:
SPX FLOW, Inc., Madji B. Abulaban, Anne K. Altman and others
WATERMAN v. SPX FLOW, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv00561
Plaintiff:
MARC WATERMAN
Defendant:
SPX FLOW, INC., ROBERT HULL, MAJDI ABULABAN and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Wilson v. SPX FLOW, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00189
Plaintiff:
Jordan Wilson
Defendant:
SPX FLOW, Inc., Majdi B. Abulaban, Anne K. Altman and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
