Cases 1 - 10 of 23
USA v. Pepper Robbins
as 21-2724
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
PEPPER ROBBINS
Michael Daugherty, et al v. Joel Adams, et al
as 20-1446
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT J. BOBACK, JOEL P. ADAMS, JOHN C. HANSBERRY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL J. DAUGHERTY and LABMD INC
Franchi v. AK Steel Holding Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv00078
Defendant:
Sheri H. Edison, Ralph S. Michael, III, Pepper Merger Sub Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Franchi
USA v. Ronald Peppers
as 19-1021
Defendant / Appellant:
RONALD PEPPERS
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Rothman v. Dr. Pepper Snapple Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00526
Plaintiff:
Al Rothman
Defendant:
Dr. Pepper Snapple Group, Inc., Wayne R. Sanders, Larry D. Young and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Goldstein v. Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00500
Plaintiff:
Howard Goldstein
Defendant:
Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc., Wayne R. Sanders, Larry D. Young and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Gonzalez v. Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00465
Plaintiff:
Ileana A. Gonzalez
Defendant:
Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc., Wayne R. Sanders, Larry D. Young and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
West v. Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00429
Plaintiff:
Richard N. West
Defendant:
Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc., Wayne R. Sanders, David E. Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Newman v. Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00442
Plaintiff:
Samuel Newman
Defendant:
Dr Pepper Snapple Group, Inc., Wayne R. Sanders, Larry D. Young and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
DAUGHERTY et al v. ADAMS et al
as 2:2017cv00368
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J. DAUGHERTY and LABMD, INC.
Defendant:
JOEL P. ADAMS , DAVID J. BECKER , ROBERT J. BOBACK and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
