Cases 1 - 10 of 94
In re: Robert Tucker
as 24-2115
Petitioner:
In re: ROBERT TUCKER
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
In re: Brian Calvert, et al v. BPS Direct LLC, et al
as 23-3235
Defendant / Appellee:
In re: BPS DIRECT LLC and CABELAS LLC
Plaintiff:
DAVID IRVIN, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, BRIAN CALVERT, HEATHER CORNELL and others
Robert TuckerIn re: Robert Tucker
as 23-2693
Petitioner:
In re: ROBERT TUCKER
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
TUCKER v. PALMER ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES INC.
as 3:2023cv20623
Plaintiff:
TYSON TUCKER
Defendant:
PALMER ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES INC.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Friedrich Lu v. Jane Young, et al
as 23-2496
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRIEDRICH LU
Defendant / Appellee:
JANE E. YOUNG, JOE H. TUCKER, JR., LESLIE M. GREENSPAN and others
Defendant:
WALTER T. MITCHELL, JAHAD HASAN, ERIC T. DONOVAN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02810
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Tucker v. BPS DIRECT, LLC
as 2:2023cv02295
Plaintiff:
Arlie Tucker
Defendant:
BPS DIRECT, LLC, CABELA'S L.L.C. and Cabela's Retail MO, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
IN RE: BPS DIRECT, LLC, AND CABELAS, LLC, WIRETAPPING LITIGATION
as 2:2023md03074
In Re:
IN RE: BPS DIRECT, LLC, AND CABELAS, LLC, WIRETAPPING LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
Timothy Durham, Arlie Tucker, GREG MOORE and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511 Wiretapping
Friedrich Lu v. Jane Young, et al
as 23-1845
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRIEDRICH LU
Defendant:
JANE E. YOUNG, BISOLA OJIKUTU, TIMOTHY J. HARRINGTON and others
Defendant / Appellee:
JOE H. TUCKER, JR., LESLIE M. GREENSPAN, TUCKER LAW GROUP LLC and others
LU v. YOUNG et al
as 2:2023cv01239
Plaintiff:
FRIEDRICH LU
Defendant:
JANE E. YOUNG, JOE H. TUCKER, JR, LESLIE MILLER GREENSPAN and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
