Cases 1 - 7 of 7
BOYTSOVA et al v. UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES et al
as 2:2023cv02217
Plaintiff:
VALENTINA BOYTSOVA, ILYA BOYTSOVA and ILYA BOYTSOV
Defendant:
UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, UR MENDOZA JADDOU, CONNIE NOLAN and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1255 Failure USCIS To Adjudicate Permanent Residency Petition
PANDYA et al v. UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES et al
as 2:2022cv01019
Plaintiff:
RAJUL PANDYA and NISHA KALIA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, UR MENDOZA JADDOU and TERRI ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
BHATIA et al v. UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES et al
as 2:2022cv00719
Plaintiff:
SAURABH A. BHATIA and PREETY TAKKAR
Defendant:
UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, UR MENDOZA JADDOU and VALERIE TOBIAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
DOUGLAS v. MAYORKAS et al
as 2:2022cv01581
Petitioner:
SUE ELLEN LOUELLA DOUGLAS
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR MENDOZA JADDOU and MERRICK B. GARLAND
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Maritime Subsidy Board
ROSE et al v. UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES et al
as 2:2022cv00582
Plaintiff:
TAELYN ROSE and MUHAMMAD TAYYAB TALAL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, UR MENDOZA JADDOU, VALERIE TOBIAS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
PATEL et al v. MAYORKAS et al
as 5:2022cv01454
Petitioner:
NAMAN MAHESHBHAI PATEL and PRIYANKABEN G GORASIYA
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR MENDOZA JADDOU and MERRICK B. GARLAND
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Maritime Subsidy Board
IMBERT OGANDO et al v. BAUSMAN et al
as 2:2022cv00639
Lead Plaintiff:
YAFREISEY IMBERT OGANDO
Plaintiff:
FRANCISCO RODRIGUEZ PERALTA
Defendant:
KATHLEEN BAUSMAN, UR MENDOZA JADDOU, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
