Cases 1 - 10 of 1,036
United States et al v. NL INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 3:2024cv08946
Defendant:
BIXON LIQUIDATION CORP., HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., FMC CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
ADMINISTRATOR OF THE NEW JERSEY SPILL COMPENSATION FUND, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, United States and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9613 CERCLA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv08426
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
FETICK et al v. KELLER et al
as 2:2024cv03329
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW FETICK and DAVID WILLIAMS
Defendant:
JOHN CLIDY, SILVER SPRINGS ENDEAVORS, LLC, MICHELE MCBRIDE and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
v. Cooper et al
as 2:2024cv03250
Defendant:
Reginald E Davis, LINCOLN NATIONAL CORPORATION, PATRICK S. PITTARD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
In Re: Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP, et al v. , et al
as 24-2167
Petitioner:
HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP
Respondent:
GLENDA JOHNSON, JOHN MARSHALL, CAROLYN SAMPSON and others
Aquil JohnsonIn re: Aquil Johnson
as 24-2141
Petitioner:
In re: AQUIL JOHNSON
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
Amazon.com, Inc. et al v. Johnson
as 1:2024cv00704
Petitioner:
Amazon.com, Inc. and Amazon Logistics, Inc.
Respondent:
Dwayne Johnson
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Johnson County, Tennessee v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY et al
as 2:2024cv06973
Defendant:
CAREMARK, LLC, ESI Mail Pharmacy Services, Inc., OPTUMINSIGHT, INC. and others
Unknown:
INSULIN PRICING LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
Johnson County, Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Solomon JohnsonIn re: Solomon Johnson
as 24-2013
Petitioner:
In re: SOLOMON JOHNSON
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-2022
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
