Cases 121 - 130 of 235
DAWSON v. THE HOME DEPOT, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv02651
Plaintiff:
DOYLE DAWSON
Defendant:
THE HOME DEPOT, INC. , HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC. and THE HOME DEPOT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCCALL et al v. AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC. et al
as 2:2016cv00620
Plaintiff:
THERESA MCCALL and KEVIN MCCALL
Defendant:
AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC. , HONDA POWER EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURING, INC. , HONDA R&D AMERICAS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MCGILL et al v. HOME DEPOT et al
as 2:2016cv01362
Plaintiff:
CARSON MCGILL and NICOLE MCGILL
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT and THE HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BRUEHL v. THE HOME DEPOT, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv01205
Plaintiff:
JOANN BRUEHL
Defendant:
THE HOME DEPOT, INC. and HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
FINGEROTH et al v. HOME DEPOT, U.S.A., INC. et al
as 2:2016cv00694
Plaintiff:
DAVID FINGEROTH and LORI FINGEROTH
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT, U.S.A., INC. , JOHN DOES 1-10 and XYZ CORPS. 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BOYD v. MASCO CORPORATION et al
as 2:2015cv06767
Plaintiff:
RUTHY BOYD
Defendant:
MASCO CORPORATION, ABC CORP, THE HOME DEPOT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Product Liability
TRAVAGLINI v. HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC. et al
as 2:2015cv04777
Plaintiff:
STEVEN TRAVAGLINI
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC. and THE HOME DEPOT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BARTHOLOMEW v. THE HOME DEPOT et al
as 2:2015cv04730
Plaintiff:
JASON BARTHOLOMEW
Defendant:
THE HOME DEPOT and HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
YANNONE v. HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
as 2:2015cv04672
Plaintiff:
ALLYSHA YANNONE
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STAMOS v. THE HOME DEPOT et al
as 2:2015cv06016
Plaintiff:
STAMATIOS STAMOS
Defendant:
THE HOME DEPOT , HOME DEPOT , HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
