Cases 41 - 50 of 73
SMITH v. YOUNG et al
as 2:2011cv00926
Plaintiff:
VALAIDA M. SMITH
Defendant:
TONY YOUNG and LAURIE MOODY-BARNETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
SMITH v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv60719
Plaintiff:
CORA M. SMITH
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. , CELOTEX CORPORATION , CROWN CORK & SEAL CO., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv57304
Plaintiff:
CRAIG M. SMITH
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
SMITH v. KROESEN
as 1:2010cv05723
Plaintiff:
PAUL M. SMITH
Defendant:
JOHN A. KROESEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
SMITH v. CALIFORNIA SHIPPING COMPANY
as 2:2010cv50659
Plaintiff:
REUBEN M SMITH
Defendant:
CALIFORNIA SHIPPING COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
SMITH v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2010cv50660
Plaintiff:
REUBEN M SMITH
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
SMITH et al v. AQUA-CHEM INC et al
as 2:2010cv67157
Plaintiff:
ROBERT W SMITH, JR and SUSAN M SMITH
Defendant:
AQUA-CHEM INC , BORG-WARNER MORSE TEC INC , CERTAINTEED CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ADAMS et al v. AC AND S, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv63741
Plaintiff:
AUDREY M. SMITH and THOMAS A. SMITH
Defendant:
AC AND S, INC., ASBESTOSPRAY CORP., FOSTER WHEELER CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH V. UNITED STATES LINES INC. REORGANIZATION TRUST
as 2:2010cv35928
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINA M. SMITH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES LINES INC. REORGANIZATION TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
SMITH v. A C & S, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv92794
Plaintiff:
JAMES M. SMITH
Defendant:
A C & S, INC., A C & S, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
