Cases 1 - 7 of 7
ARPS et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv14523
Plaintiff:
JAMES ARPS and ESTATE OF TABITHA ARPS, DECEASED
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ARP v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC et al
as 3:2021cv16813
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
BRENDA ARP
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ARP v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2021cv15414
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY ARP
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC.
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Feher et al v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv13451
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES INC. and others
Plaintiff:
Barbara Feher, JOSE GOMEZ, Trinidad Acosta and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ALLEN et al v. MCKESSON CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv05821
Plaintiff:
WILLIE ALLEN , DAISY ARNETT , JERRY ARP and others
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION and SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Arp v. Merck Sharpe & Dohme, Corp.
as 3:2013cv00939
Plaintiff:
Julie Katherine Arp
Defendant:
Merck Sharpe & Dohme Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
ARP et al v. RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2010cv67073
Plaintiff:
LARRY T ARP, SR. and BRENDA J ARP
Defendant:
RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
