Cases 1 - 9 of 9
HOWELL et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2015cv05604
Plaintiff:
PATSY N. HOWELL and PHILIP D. HOWELL
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON and ETHICON, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOWELL v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv52851
Plaintiff:
CHARLES D. HOWELL
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
HOWELL et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv64597
Plaintiff:
RONALD HOWELL and NANCY D HOWELL
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOWELL v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv32506
Plaintiff:
CHARLES D. HOWELL
Defendant:
SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
HOWELL et al v. A.C. AND S. INC. et al
as 2:2009cv82790
Defendant:
WEIL MCLAIN COMPANY, INC., AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC., FEDERAL MOGUL PRODUCTS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
EVELYN HOWELL and JOHN D. HOWELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOWELL et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2009cv00282
Plaintiff:
CHARLES D. HOWELL, WOODROW A. JONES, PATRICIA NICHOLS and others
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: Diversity
HOWELL v. ABCO INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2008cv71801
Plaintiff:
JAMES D. HOWELL
Defendant:
ABCO INDUSTRIES, INC., AEROQUUIP INTERNATIONAL, INC., AEROQUIP CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
ANDERSON et al v. A C AND S INC et al
as 2:2007cv66402
Defendant:
WEIL MCLAIN COMPANY, INC., AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC., FEDERAL MOGUL PRODUCTS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
WALTER EUGENE COLLATT, MARY BLAYLOCK, VERNELL BRADLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOWELL et al v. AC&S, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv62644
Plaintiff:
CARROLL D. HOWELL, AUDREY HOWELL, AUDREY HOWELL and others
Defendant:
AC&S, INC., AC&S, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
