Cases 1 - 8 of 8
BUTLER et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv10808
Plaintiff:
STEWART BUTLER and THE ESTATE OF EMMA E. BUTLER
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES & PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BEY v. KRAUS et al
as 2:2023cv01126
Plaintiff:
HARUN BEY
Defendant:
SHERIFF KEVIN KRAUS, CHIEF DEPUTY JOHN A. KEARNEY, DEPUTY MIKE FROST and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
BUTLER-SISNROY v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2018cv02325
Plaintiff:
MARY E. BUTLER-SISNROY
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. , IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC. ("IMERYS TALC") and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TAMI v. BUTLER et al
as 2:2017cv12254
Plaintiff:
LORI TAMI
Defendant:
WILLIAM E BUTLER, JR. , N.J. TRANSIT CORP. and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BUTLER v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv42898
Plaintiff:
BRUCE E. BUTLER
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
ADAMS v. GAF CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv80011
Plaintiff:
SHANNON E. BUTLER
Defendant:
GAF CORPORATION, THE FLINTKOTE COMPANY, ROCKWOOL MANUFACTURING COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BUTLER v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2010cv39943
Plaintiff:
CHARLES E BUTLER
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ACANDS, INC., ACORN IRON & SUPPLY CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
BUTLER v. GARLOCK SEALING TECHNOLOGIES, L.L.C. et al
as 2:2009cv66080
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. BUTLER, JR.
Defendant:
GARLOCK SEALING TECHNOLOGIES, L.L.C., GARLOCK SEALING TECHNOLOGIES, L.L.C., OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
