Cases 1 - 10 of 20
HARRIS v. RUDMAN
as 1:2023cv23240
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL R. HARRIS and MICHAEL R. HARRIS, ESQ.
Defendant:
MITCHELL RUDMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
HARRIS v. ETHICON, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv02056
Plaintiff:
JANICE R. HARRIS
Defendant:
ETHICON, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARRIS v. ACANDS, INC.
as 2:2011cv68568
Plaintiff:
WALTER R. HARRIS
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
HARRIS v. MANVILLE CORP ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
as 2:2011cv68083
Plaintiff:
WALTER R. HARRIS
Defendant:
MANVILLE CORP ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
HARRIS v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2010cv57821
Plaintiff:
WALTER R HARRIS
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
HARRIS v. CAREY CANADA, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv69203
Plaintiff:
JAMES R. HARRIS
Defendant:
CAREY CANADA, INC. and CELOTEX CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GIDDENS et al v. A.C. AND S., INC.
as 2:2010cv64320
Plaintiff:
HUGH HARRIS and HELEN R. HARRIS
Defendant:
A.C. AND S., INC., A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARRIS et al v. RAPID AMERICAN CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv93545
Plaintiff:
JOHN R. HARRIS
Defendant:
RAPID AMERICAN CORPORATION and RILEY POWER INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
HARRIS v. SEABOARD COSTLINE RAILROAD et al
as 2:2009cv92677
Plaintiff:
TERRY R. HARRIS
Defendant:
SEABOARD COSTLINE RAILROAD, ATLANTIC COASTLINE RAILROAD and GEORGIA AND FLORIDA RAILROAD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
HARRIS v. AC & S, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv92710
Plaintiff:
JAMES R. HARRIS
Defendant:
AC & S, INC., AC & S, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
