Cases 11 - 18 of 18
HIGH POINT INSURANCE COMPANY v. FRIGIDAIRE et al
as 3:2015cv02191
Plaintiff:
HIGH POINT INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
FRIGIDAIRE , ELECTROLUX MAJOR APPLIANCES , ELECTROLUX HOME PRODUCTS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
EDMONDSON v. LILLISTON FORD, INC. et al
as 1:2013cv07704
Plaintiff:
SARA ANN EDMONDSON
Defendant:
LILLISTON FORD, INC. , JANE AND JOHN DOES 1-10 and XYZ CORPORATIONS 1-10
Counter_claimant:
LILLISTON FORD, INC.
Counter_defendant:
SARA ANN EDMONDSON
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
MAYER v. VERIZON NEW JERSEY, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv03980
Plaintiff:
ARNO MAYER
Defendant:
VERIZON NEW JERSEY, INC. , NYNEX LONG DISTANCE COMPANY , JANE AND JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3731 Fraud
PREMIO FOODS, INC. v. PERDUE FARMS, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv04968
Plaintiff:
PREMIO FOODS, INC.
Defendant:
PERDUE FARMS, INC. , FPP FAMILY INVESTMENTS, INC. , COLEMAN NATURAL FOODS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Casannova v. Hampton Inn, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv00993
Plaintiff:
Andrew Casannova
Defendant:
Hampton Inn, Inc., John Does 1-10 and XYZ Corporations
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
RODRIGUEZ et al v. INDYMAC BANK et al
as 2:2009cv05843
Plaintiff:
JOSE A. RODRIGUEZ, SR. and LOUSIA A. RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
INDYMAC BANK, IMB MANAGMENT HOLDINGS, XYZ CORPORATIONS (1-5) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
MALDONADO v. US AIRWAYS et al
as 1:2008cv06196
Plaintiff:
CARMEN MALDONADO
Defendant:
US AIRWAYS, JOHN AND/OR JANE DOES and XYZ CORPORATION (1-12)
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
STAPLES et al v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY et al
as 3:2007cv05942
Plaintiff:
PAUL BRIAN STAPLES and MELINDA STAPLES
Defendant:
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, GE HEALTHCARE, INC., GE BOI-SCIENCES CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
