Cases 11 - 20 of 78
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01212
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
GURVEY et al v. M&T BANK, INC. et al
as 2:2023cv01007
Plaintiff:
H. SCOTT GURVEY and AMY R. WEISSBROD GURVEY
Defendant:
M&T BANK, INC., ESSEX COUNTY OF NEW JERSEY, SCHILLER, KNAPP, LEFKOWITZ & HERTZEL, LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GERMANO v. BECK et al
as 3:2023cv00344
Plaintiff:
LAURA GERMANO
Defendant:
JENNIFER BECK, VIN GOPAL, CHRIS WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DONOHUE v. CAPELLA UNIVERSITY, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv05634
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW DONOHUE
Defendant:
CAPELLA UNIVERSITY, LLC, REBECCA LOEHRER, BARRY TRUNK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CARPENTER v. MULLER et al
as 3:2022cv00954
Plaintiff:
DAVID B. CARPENTER
Defendant:
AMY SUZANNE MULLER and DENNIS CHARLES DOUGHERTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CARPENTER v. MULLER et al
as 3:2022cv00953
Plaintiff:
DAVID B. CARPENTER
Defendant:
AMY SUZANNE MULLER and DENNIS CHARLES DOUGHERTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00230
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00230
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GURVEY et al v. GRANT et al
as 2:2021cv16397
Plaintiff:
H. SCOTT GURVEY and AMY R. GURVEY
Defendant:
HON. GLENN A. GRANT, HON. STUART RABNER, HON. THOMAS MOORE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
PATEL v. THE UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2021cv16029
Plaintiff:
THE EXCELLENT RAJ K. PATEL
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES, THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, JOE R. BIDEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
