Cases 11 - 20 of 877
Hines v. Jones et al
as 3:2024cv00366
Plaintiff:
James Hines
Defendant:
Michael Jones and John and Jane Doe(s) I-X
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00296
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
DOE et al v. THE HAVERFORD SCHOOL
as 2:2024cv00618
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE and JANE DOE
Defendant:
THE HAVERFORD SCHOOL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
BERMAN v. RITE AID et al
as 2:2024cv00598
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY BERMAN
Defendant:
RITE AID, JANE DOES 1 THROUGH 20 and JANE DOES 21 THROUGH 50
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00233
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
MOSES-FARRARE v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2024cv00540
Plaintiff:
EARLENE MOSES-FARRARE
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, POLICE OFFICER BERTHESI, BADGE#2090, POLICE OFFICER MARY F. KUCHINSKY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
DOVEL v. LANCASTER COUNTY et al
as 2:2024cv00467
Plaintiff:
TAMALA KATHLEEN DOVEL
Defendant:
LANCASTER COUNTY, WARDEN PAUL SMEAL, CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS JOHN/JANE DOE#'S 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00468
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00306
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
