Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-3337
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ronald Gillette v. Diane Prosper, et al
as 16-1662
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD EDWARD GILLETTE
Defendant - Appellee:
ACTING WARDEN DIANE PROSPER, JULIUS WILSON, in his capacity as the Director of Prisons, TERRITORY OF VIRGIN ISLANDS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-2047
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Julio Suarez v. Attorney General United States, et al
as 15-1976
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JULIO SUAREZ
Defendant - Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and DIRECTOR BUREAU OF ALCOHOL TOBACCO FIREARMS & EXPLOSIVES
Julio Suarez v. Attorney General United States, et al
as 15-1975
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JULIO SUAREZ
Defendant - Appellant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and DIRECTOR BUREAU OF ALCOHOL TOBACCO FIREARMS & EXPLOSIVES
Daniel Binderup v. Attorney General United State
as 14-4550
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL BINDERUP
Defendant - Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and DIRECTOR BUREAU OF ALCOHOL TOBACCO FIREARMS & EXPLOSIVES
Daniel Binderup v. Attorney General United State
as 14-4549
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DANIEL BINDERUP
Defendant - Appellant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and DIRECTOR BUREAU OF ALCOHOL TOBACCO FIREARMS & EXPLOSIVES
Michael Duffy v. Superintendent Army Corps, et al
as 14-3991
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL DUFFY
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, Philadelphia District, ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, COUNTY OF KENT and others
Michael Duffy v. Kent County Delaware, et al
as 14-3990
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL DUFFY
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF KENT, KENT COUNTY DELAWARE INC, KENT COUNTY LEVY COURT and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-3851
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
