Cases 11 - 20 of 26
STONE et al v. DHS-DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES
as 2:2018cv04743
Plaintiff:
NANETTE STONE and IMANI STONE
Defendant:
DHS-DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
RICHARDSON v. DHS et al
as 2:2015cv03776
Plaintiff:
ANTOINETTE RICHARDSON
Defendant:
DHS and SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARNES v. GYN DOCTORS et al
as 2:2015cv03477
Plaintiff:
BIANCA RENEE BARNES
Defendant:
GYN DOCTORS, LABOR FLOOR DOCTORS, DHS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOUSTON v. DHS DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES/TANYA BETANCOURT et al
as 2:2015cv03377
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW HOUSTON
Defendant:
DHS DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES/TANYA BETANCOURT, CHILD ADVOCACY and WOMAN CHRISTIAN ALLIANCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HOUSTON v. DHS et al
as 2:2014cv02770
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW HOUSTON
Defendant:
DHS, TANYA BETANCOURT and CHILD ADVOCATE ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARNES v. DHS et al
as 2:2014cv02769
Plaintiff:
BIANCA BARNES
Defendant:
DHS, TANYA BETANCOURTS and CHILD ADVOCATE ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MASON v. "DHS" et al
as 2:2011cv04614
Plaintiff:
FLORENCE-ELIZABETH MASON
Defendant:
"DHS, THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRINAGE v. SULLIVAN et al
as 2:2010cv00179
Plaintiff:
LORRAINE GRINAGE
Defendant:
SAUNDRA SULLIVAN, PAED 470, FRAUD SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BROWNSON v. AMBROSE et al
as 2:2009cv05448
Plaintiff:
WILLIE BROWNSON
Defendant:
ANNE M. AMBROSE, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA DHS and ROBERT J. MATTHEWS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WASHINGTON v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2008cv04634
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, THE DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES ("DHS") OF PHILA., MULTI-ETHNIC BEHAVORIAL HEALTH INC. and others
Plaintiff:
TROY WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
