Cases 21 - 30 of 38
MEISLER v. COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY et al
as 2:2014cv01512
Plaintiff:
SHARON R. MEISLER
Defendant:
COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY and KEIR BRADFORD-GREY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GOCHIN v. WALL et al
as 2:2013cv00031
Plaintiff:
DIANE R. GOCHIN
Defendant:
KELLY C. WALL, ARTHUR TILSON, MINDY HARRIS, ESQ. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv05714
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
HASTY v. COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY et al
as 2:2012cv04335
Plaintiff:
JAMES HASTY
Defendant:
COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY , CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL CARE, INC. , MARGARET CARILLO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv03218
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01995
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
TAGGART v. COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY et al
as 2:2012cv01913
Plaintiff:
KENNETH J. TAGGART
Defendant:
COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY, COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY - STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, PROTHONOTARY OF MONTGOMERY COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA and others
Thirdparty_defendant:
GMAC MORTGAGE, LLC and MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS INCORPORATED & MERSCORP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GAYNOR v. PEFFALL et al
as 2:2012cv00057
Plaintiff:
JEFF GAYNOR
Defendant:
RICHARD PEFFALL, KATE MCGILL-MAGID, MARY ANDERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SWEETMAN v. BORO OF NORRISTOWN PA et al
as 2:2011cv07404
Plaintiff:
GERHARD SWEETMAN
Defendant:
BORO OF NORRISTOWN PA, COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY PA, STATE OF PA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv06376
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
