Cases 31 - 40 of 380
Jaye v. United States et al (MAG +)
as 1:2022cv05328
Defendant:
KNUCKLES, KOMOSINSKI & MANFRO, LLP, BERMAN, SAUTER, RECORD & JARDIM, PC, Kemeny, Ramp & Renaud, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Chris Jaye
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv04975
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv04246
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
LANE v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2022cv04241
Plaintiff:
COREY LANE
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY and MICHELLE M. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SAISI v. GILLIARD et al
as 2:2022cv02577
Plaintiff:
HEMMINGWAY M. SAISI
Defendant:
VICTORIA PALMER GILLIARD, ERSKINE R. GLOVER and HOPE M. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
CARPENTER v. SMITH
as 3:2022cv01929
Plaintiff:
DAVID B. CARPENTER
Defendant:
SUZANNE SENNETT SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
MARCHISOTTO v. DALEY et al
as 3:2022cv01276
Plaintiff:
JOHN F. MARCHISOTTO
Defendant:
ROGER W. DALEY, SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION, SUPERIOR COURT TRUST FUND UNIT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MULLINGS v. RAGHNAL et al
as 2:2022cv01294
Plaintiff:
WESLEY-KEITH: MULLINGS
Defendant:
HARRIET ELAINE RAGHNAL, AISHA MARGARET SMITH, STATE OF NEW JERSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SMITH v. CITY OF TRENTON et al
as 3:2022cv00380
Plaintiff:
WILL SMITH
Defendant:
CITY OF TRENTON, OFFICER ANTONIO T. WILKIE-GUIOT, PAUL DANIELS and others
Cross Defendant:
TIO MIO, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
SMITH v. COMACHO et al
as 3:2021cv20654
Plaintiff:
WILL SMITH
Defendant:
STEVEN COMACHO, TIO MIO, INC, LA TERRAZA BAR & RESTAURANT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
