Cases 31 - 40 of 527
REARDON et al v. WACKER et al
as 1:2023cv03147
Plaintiff:
JOHN E. REARDON
Defendant:
VIRGINIA WACKER, VINCENT SEGAL and RICHARD KLEIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
EZEKWO v. BRINGER et al
as 1:2023cv02746
Plaintiff:
IFEOMA EZEKWO
Defendant:
NORAH E. BRINGER, ARTHUR T. CATTERALL, DAVID A. HUBERT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
EZEKWO v. BRINGER et al
as 2:2023cv02746
Plaintiff:
IFEOMA EZEKWO
Defendant:
NORAH E. BRINGER, ARTHUR T. CATTERALL, DAVID A. HUBERT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MARY ROSE 22, LLC v. ROKES et al
as 2:2023cv02544
Defendant:
THE TRUST COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY, BERGENFIELD STATE BANK, ESTELLA ROKES and others
Plaintiff:
MARY ROSE 22, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
WOODHAM v. MORGAN STANLEY et al
as 1:2023cv02080
Plaintiff:
STACEY WOODHAM
Defendant:
MORGAN STANLEY and E TRADE FINANCIAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
KINCH v. CAULFIELD et al
as 2:2023cv02076
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MAURICE KINCH
Defendant:
REGINA CAULFIELD, JUAN SMITH, ANTONIO LACOSTA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01629
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
MORTILLARO et al v. MARULANDA et al
as 2:2023cv01479
Plaintiff:
SALVATORE MORTILLARO and VICTORIA STILLO
Defendant:
D MARULANDA, A KONOPKA and E TYLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01364
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00889
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
