Civil Rights Cases filed in New Jersey
Cases 41 - 50 of 96
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv01744
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv01578
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAADHIO v. GETER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv08809
Plaintiff: RANDY BAADHIO
Defendant: CHARLES GETER, SAMUEL T. FRISBY, JAMES PLOUSIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv08476
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al v. MUHAMMAD We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv04812
Plaintiff: ABDUL-ALI MUHAMMAD
Defendant: FLORENCE TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT , JONATHAN GREENBURG , NICOLE BONILLA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SURTI et al v. CRAIG et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv03949
Plaintiff: ROHIT B. SURTI and JAYSHRI R. SURTI
Defendant: KEVIN CRAIG , LAURA WINKEL , CITY OF ABSECON POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv02761
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
ALFORD v ULMER
as 3:2015cv02638
Plaintiff: CRAIG ALFORD
Defendant: EMT AGENT ULMER and NJ STATE PAROLE BOARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv02291
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv06990
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?