Cases 41 - 50 of 114
Balkanli v. United States of America et al
as 3:2018cv16021
Defendant:
SUSAN D. WIGENTON and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
MUHARREM BALKANLI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PURISIMA v. NEW JERSEY TRANSIT CORPORATION et al
as 2:2018cv14903
Plaintiff:
ANTON PURISIMA
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY TRANSIT, NEW JERSEY TRANSIT CORPORATION, NEW JERSEY TRANSIT RAIL OPERATIONS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv14511
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. UNITED COMMUNITIES, LLC
as 1:2018cv14355
Defendant:
UNITED COMMUNITIES, LLC
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BALICE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2018cv13560
Defendant:
DAVID J. KAUTTER, KEVIN MCNULTY, U.S. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BALICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2018cv13560
Plaintiff:
Michael Balice
Defendant:
DENNIS CRENNAN, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and Kevin McNulty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
BOCCHICCHIO v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2018cv09266
Plaintiff:
VINCENT BOCCHICCHIO
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL LAWYER, LOS ANGELES CA VA HOSPITAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOCCHICCHIO v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2018cv00895
Plaintiff:
VINCENT BOCCHICCHIO
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BALICE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2017cv13601
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BALICE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , M. MACGILLIVRAY , KEVIN MCNULTY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
REARDON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2017cv05868
Plaintiff:
JOHN E REARDON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
