Cases 51 - 60 of 899
Jones v. Central Intelligence Agency et al
as 1:2023cv01967
Plaintiff:
Joshua Anthony Jones
Defendant:
Central Intelligence Agency, Department of Defense, Office of Secretary of Defense and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Jones v. Department of Defense
as 1:2023cv01969
Plaintiff:
Joshua Anthony Jones
Defendant:
Department of Defense and Central Intelligence Agency
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Rahman v. Jones, Jr. Esq
as 3:2023cv01962
Plaintiff:
Farida B. Rahman
Defendant:
Thomas Jones, Jr. Esq
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JONES v. LUMPKIN
as 2:2023cv04644
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER-LOREN JONES
Defendant:
CHARLES L. LUMPKIN, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JONES v. LUMPKIN
as 2:2023cv04688
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER LOREN JONES
Defendant:
CHARLES L. LUMPKIN, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
POWERS v. WEBB et al
as 2:2023cv04679
Plaintiff:
RACHEL GENEVIEVE POWERS
Defendant:
JEREMIAH DARNELL WEBB, NOAH SENCER ROBERT BARCLAY, MALAKAI LEVI LYNCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04483
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Stubbs, III v. United States of America et al
as 4:2023cv01899
Plaintiff:
Henry Christopher Stubbs, III
Defendant:
United States of America, Yvette Kane, C. Darnell Jones, II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04349
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
JONES v. PHILADELPHIA PARKING AUTHORITY et al
as 2:2023cv04343
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER LOREN JONES
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA PARKING AUTHORITY and CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
